Reading reflection #6 (due July 5)
On this page:
This is old content
Andrew is not currently teaching IAT-339. This material is left online for reference only.
Instructions
While reading or after reading "A Designer's Code of Ethics" (Monteiro, 2017) please highlight sentences in the text that you believe are most relevant to the upcoming P3: Portfolio project.
Once done highlighting, please:
- Select two highlights that you believe are most relevant to the upcoming P3: Portfolio project.
- Explain why you believe each highlight is most relevant.
Submission
Your responses can be submitted anytime before the lecture on July 5 to the reading reflection on Canvas.
Grading
This reading reflection is worth 5% (5 points) of your final grade.
- 0.5 points for submitting your reading with highlights as requested.
- 1 point for clearly citing which two highlighted portions of the text you are referring to using a standard citation format and indicating a page or paragraph number (0.5 points per portion cited).
- 3.5 points for a on-topic explanation of why you believe each highlight is most relevant (1.75 points per explanation).
How reflections work
Just a reminder about how reflections work:
- You only need to complete two reflections over the term.
- There are seven available.
- You may complete up to three reflections and the lowest grade will be dropped.