ahandrewh teaches IAT-339web design & development

Instructions

While reading or after reading "A Designer's Code of Ethics" (Monteiro, 2017) please highlight sentences in the text that you believe are part of the argument or claims of the author.

Once done highlighting, please:

1. State what you believe the author is claiming.
2. Describe how the author supports their claim with an example.
3. Explain why you are convinced or unconvinced by their claim.
4. Explain how your practice may change in future in response to the claim.

Submission

Your responses can be submitted anytime before the end of lecture on November 7 to Andrew in class.

Grading

This reading reflection is worth 5% (5 points) of your final grade.

• 0.5 points for submitting your reading with highlights as requested above.
• 0.5 points for a clear and concise statement of what the author is claiming.
• 0.5 points for an example of how the author supports their claim.
• 2.5 points for a clear and concise explanation of why you are convince or unconvinced by their claim.
• 1 point for a clear and concise explanation of how your practice may change in the future in response to the claim.

How reflections work

Just a reminder about how reflections work:

• You only need to complete two reflections over the term.
• There are four available.
• You may complete up to three reflections and the lowest grade will be dropped.