Reading reflection #4 (due November 7)
On this page:
Name
SFU Student #
Date
Lab #
Instructions
While reading or after reading "A Designer's Code of Ethics" (Monteiro, 2017) please highlight sentences in the text that you agree or disagree with.
Once done highlighting, please:
- Cite one of your highlights from the reading.
- State your opinion of the cited text — i.e. in agreement, do not agree, unsure of how I feel, etc. — and explain why you hold this opinion.
- Explain why you believe this highlight will influence or not influence your work as a web designer or developer.
Submission
Your responses can be submitted anytime before the end of lecture on November 7 to Andrew in class.
Grading
This reading reflection is worth 5% (5 points) of your final grade.
- 0.5 points for submitting your reading with highlights as requested.
- 0.5 point for clearly citing which highlighted portion of the text you are referring to using a standard citation format and indicating a page or paragraph number.
- 2 points for a clear and concise explanation of why you hold a particular opinion in relation to the cited text.
- 2 points for a clear and concise explanation of why you bleieve this highlight will influence or not influence your work as a designer or developer.
How reflections work
Just a reminder about how reflections work:
- You only need to complete two reflections over the term.
- There are four available.
- You may complete up to three reflections and the lowest grade will be dropped.