Reading reflection #2 (due September 23)
On this page:
Name
SFU Student #
Date
Lab #
How reflections work
Just a reminder about how reflections work:
- You only need to complete two reflections over the term.
- There are four available.
- You may complete up to three reflections and the lowest grade will be dropped.
- AI use is not permitted in reflections.
Instructions
Reading reflections must be done in-person during lab times. Bring a print-out of the reading to lab if you choose to do the reflection.
While reading or after reading "Why Wireframes Still Matter (Chapter 1)" (Angeles et al, 2023) please highlight sentences in the text that introduced new or different ideas to you.
Once done highlighting, please:
- State what you believe the author is claiming using at least two highlights as examples.
- State if you believe this author's argument influences your work as a designer, developer, or otherwise.
- Explain why you believe it influences (or does not influence) your work.
Submission
Your TA will have a print-out for completing the reading reflection on in your September 23 lab. You will need to provide a print-out of the reading. Reading reflections must be completed in the lab time.
Grading
This reading reflection is worth 5% (5 points) of your final grade.
- 0.5 points for submitting your reading with highlights as requested.
- 1.5 points are given for clearly stating what you believe the author is claiming using at least two highlights as examples indicating a page or paragraph number.
- 3 points are given for a clear and concise explanation of if you believe this author's argument influences your work in a specific role (i.e. designer, developer, etc) and why you believe it influences (or does not influence) your work.
How reflections work
- You only need to complete two reflections over the term.
- There are four available.
- You may complete up to three reflections and the lowest grade will be dropped.
- AI use is not permitted in reflections.